As in a tasty mix of talk

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Take Me Out to the Obama Game

I don’t know much about baseball, except that I love washing down Dodger dogs with a good beer and get chills when I hear that “krak” that means a batter has knocked a ball out of the park.

Anyone who doesn’t realize that Obama was at the top of his game during last night’s address must not have noticed that, in addition to hitting homers, he also stole some bases. Not once, not twice, but several times he brought the Republican side of the room to its feet to cheer his remarks. Dodger dog, anyone?

In the game of leadership, Obama appears to be even more of a Natural than Robert Redford in the baseball-themed nineties movie of that name. Or, is it just that the Bad News Team on the Right is so inept that they inadvertently have sent Obama soaring over the opinion polls scoreboard?

When John McCain took Obama to task over the cost of his helicopters in a news briefing earlier yesterday, Obama turned him into a straight man, using his remarks as a setup for getting supportive laughs. Republicans cannot, repeat cannot, fluster the President with an unexpected question. He is most adept when responding on his feet, much better at playing “backatcha” than Republicans are at “gotcha.”

A better illustration of Republicans clutching-up at bat is their choice of Bobby Jindal to make the followup address. Ok, he’s brown. We get it, Republicans are inclusive too. But they are playing T-ball in the big leagues here. Jindal’s deer-in-the-headlights demeanor, his stilted delivery, and his repetition of the same tired Republican push-back made Obama’s message appear stronger and more sincere than it already did.

And Jindal fooled no one with his disingenuous comparison of his own immigrant heritage to Obama’s. Leave it to the GOP to mix racism and terrorist fears in one steaming dish, and slyly serve it up to a nation that now hungers for hope and optimism.

If Bobby Jindal is the frontrunner for the Republican Presidential nominee in 2012, someone should send him back to the batting cage. His comparison of Obama’s new programs to the pathetic Republican response to Hurricane Katrina was stunningly inept, a reminder of all the reasons we elected a Democrat in the last election.

But Obama’s leadership skills have not been highlighted by Republican errors alone. In last night’s speech he made it clear that he is not the Centrist that many decry, but is somewhere Left of that label. He will not, as many predicted, delay the fight to provide affordable health care insurance for every American. He will not apologize for allowing tax cuts for the rich to expire. And even though his timeline for ending the war in Iraq may have lengthened from 16 months to 19, it remains a priority that was applauded even by former hawk John McCain.

Did you hear that “krak?”

34 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yak---OMG OMG OMG! I wanted to cry several times last night. I mean he really is my POLITICAL SOUL MATE...I'm convinced! I am still in shock that we have elected him in office as I agree and agree more and agree again with his entire philisophical views and his entire political agenda. I couldn't be more proud :) I am drinking Kool Aid mixed with Hopium right now:)

11:47 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

One of my favorite lines, that I hope will be repeated many times to the children of America was...If you drop out of high school, you aren't just quitting on yourself, you are quitting on your country...

11:48 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Whether you disagree with his plans, or dont like him for whatever (unimaginable)reason at least we FINALLY have somebody in there doing SOMETHING! He is not sitting around with his thumb up his ass waiting for Congress to tell him what to do. He is taking action... So, to all those critics who say there is no way he can accomplish everything he is setting out to do I say BAH!!! How many of you said "There is no way he can be president"?????
Give him a chance. At least he is doing something. Bush's idea of fixing things was to sit around and do nothing.....Look where that got us.
AND, how refreshing to have a President that can express himself with such style and grace......

12:01 PM

 
Blogger Unknown said...

Another Grand Slam, Yak!

I kept pinching myself, realizing that, yes, we have a real LEADER in the White House. This guy is the real deal and could not have been any more impressive. You are right, the Republican response was anemic and ill-conceived. I was laughing at their attempt to use Katrina as an example of how government is inept when all it does is remind us that THEIR form of government is inept.

12:14 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said: He is not sitting around with his thumb up his ass waiting for Congress to tell him what to do. He is taking action...

Yes, he is 'taking action' allright, thanks to the executive priviledge provisions put into power under Bush. Didn't you liberals howl about those for 8 years? Then Obama was asked if he will reverse those powers, he said no. Hmmmmmm.. nobodys talking about that.

How come it's called 'taking action' when your side does it but 'abuse of power' when the other side does it? Just cause the end result turns out your way it doesn't justify the means. Don't you see you're being hypocrites? Maybe you drive a hybrid instead of a SUV, but that 'my guy's in charge so f-you' attitude won't get us any further than Bush did.

1:06 PM

 
Blogger Judy Williams said...

What impressed me the most was the overall pleasantness of the evening. I'm sure it was because he's the new guy and everybody is still caught up in the rapture (myself included to a certain extent) but it was such a delight to see all of the smiles and hugs. Not that you have to be charismatic to be a great leader, but it sure was nice to see somebody that had some charm and personal magnetism. I haven't seen that many smiles in 8 years. I liked that he was self assured and confident but some of the things said weren't quite specific enough for me, but at least he's willing to do something. He's a great statesman and I hope that his optimism and ideas can actually come to fruition. I'm gonna root root root for the home team. :~)

2:17 PM

 
Blogger Laurie Allee said...

Um... those troops leaving Iraq are not exactly coming home. They are headed straight to Afghanistan for a protracted quagmire that by all reasonable study will be a bigger mess than Iraq.

Not to be a buzzkiller, but this is a huge elephant in the room. And I do mean hawkish, Republican-inspired elephant.

And thank you, Melissa, for mentioning executive privilege. There is so much double-standard praise here I can hardly see straight.

Let's keep with the baseball metaphor and just all admit Obama plays the game better than the Right -- but he's still playing the same game. I'll root for his team over Bush's, no question, but I'm not going to agree that he's somehow morally superior than the big, bad, evil Republicans. It's like steroid use in baseball. We don't like it when the other team does it. But we somehow forgive OUR pitcher for doping, especially if our doping pitcher is hip, and doing public service announcements for a cause we believe in.

I thought there was a lot of REALLY good stuff last night, but a ton of truly empty rhetoric, too. But I gotta say, it's a joy to watch Obama when contrasted to Bush.

I'm optimistic about a lot of things -- but Afghanistan will be this administration's downfall if they continue on the same, over-militaristic path. The anti-war movement can't possibly put its head in the sand about what is happening. By always giving Obama a pass becasue we trust his "vision" and always giving him benefit of the doubt when something he says or does is right out of Reagan's mouth, we are not doing our job as critical thinking citizens, in my humble opinion. This Afghanistan stuff is a huge problem... and too many people aren't reading the fine print of the Iraq troop withdrawal. This reminds me so much of LBJ and Vietnam. I sincerely hope I'm wrong, wrong, wrong about all of it.

On another note, I sure like seeing Michelle. It's so nice to see an first lady who appears to be paying attention and doesn't look medicated.

2:44 PM

 
Blogger Yakpate said...

Laurie: Do you know Melissa? I wanted to thank her for visiting and leaving a comment, but there's no live link to her. I appreciate it when readers leave dissenting opinions... otherwise, there's no stimulating debate.

2:57 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Whoa...! I can't believe I'm going to type this....some one stop me....but..but...I agree with Laurie, mostly.

As I read the post I couldn't help but feel that it was so nice and warm and fuzzy...kinda like how I felt when Clinton first took office. Remember, he too promised big things and change. And then the reality of the Washington Machine set in.

Obama set some incredible things that I would bet everyone on this blog agrees with. His public acknowledgement of education, green energy, personal and corporate accountability were all beautifully stated, but the reality is only time will tell if his visions come to pass. News today is he's asking for another $75.5 billion for this year to support a beef up in Afghanistan. Now he may eventually withdraw from Iran, cause he says he will don't you know, but so far all I see is more young men and women going to a far away land to kill people. Sounds like the war is still on if you ask me. And who's paying for it? Me and you and you and you and you....

All that aside and the fact that America did not invent the auto, he does still give me hope that we shall overcome this0 nightmare that Bush and his posse left us with. My real fear now though is will we be able to deal with the nightmare( deficit) that Obama leaves us with?

4:27 PM

 
Blogger Laurie Allee said...

I knew I was not paranoid about Obama's hawkish positions when, in his first few weeks, he continued the drone air strike bombings in PAKISTAN. Just like Bush. With mostly young children and women killed. Pakistan. A country we're not even at war with. And he calls it continuing to fight the "War on Terror." There was a lot of interesting discussion about it on Bill Moyers and NPR. Moyers also has a great video essay about Afghanistan this week.

Yak, I don't believe I know Melissa.

5:17 PM

 
Blogger Laurie Allee said...

Chris Floyd's take on the Iraq situation.

If anyone is interested.

5:21 PM

 
Blogger San Diego Farmgirl said...

I didn't watch Obama's address, so I'm going to take your word for it that he delivered. Not a shocker, the guy is a gifted communicator. Much better communi-ma-cation skills than his predecessor.

Frankly, I've been up to my eyeballs interpreting Obama's housing plan and bank rescue plan, and I need a break from all this pricey ambition!

Since I've been assigned the beat, naturally I'm most concerned about the Treasury. Remember the old Bush strategy of solving the money shortage by just printing some more? Well, the Treasury's printing presses are SMOKING these days, and the consequences of doing that aren't any less because a Democrat is in charge. Don't forget, Geithner is one of the three amigos - Greenspan, Bernanke and Geithner - so, even though we have a new president, the guys in charge, Geithner and Bernanke, are the same dudes who caused this mess in the first place. And we're trusting them to fix it? WHY?!?!

Answer me that, Mr. President?!?!

5:26 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Actually, as far as Executive Privilege is concerned one of Obama's first orders of business was to UNDO the Bush administration policy that restricted release of presidential documents and included not only the Pres. but the V.P, other staff members AND even their family members could with this policy then invoke executive privilege. So he did UNDO the damage there.
Executive Privilege has been around since before Nixon and many presidents have used it or tried to use it. The real ABUSE came when Bush put this policy in effect...which Obama reversed.

I mean if it can't be said the man is trying to be transparent, which is a direct CONTRAST from the past administration, I don't know what can be said??!! He is demanding full disclosure of the war costs to AMERICANS and what opposing people are calling just "eloquent speeches", I see as something else. He is trying to set a vision and direction (any person who has worked in the Corporate world can attest to the fact that Presidents of companies do this every day) set a vision, set the tone, let the people KNOW and understand the goals, problem solve WITH them and then let them execute.
As far as Afghan is concerned it seems to me people are forgetting that he is adding to the troops already there, the war was already going on there too...its not like he started it and went in under some mis-guided, non-transparent reason, we have troops there, the insurgence is deepening, people are dying, the war is escalating...can he help it that we are already there? How come we aren't questioning that once again we were completely lied to by Bush? How come we aren't saying, wait a second, excuse me, didn't Bush tell me we won this war already? Should Obama leave the 5,000 or so troops that Bush left behind to supposedly oversee the new "Democratic" government there, out in the cold? If it were my husband/wife/child there I sure wouldn't want him to.
Here I agree with him once again, its going to take talking to our enemies and reaching out our hand to have any role in helping solving the problems over there. And as Yak has pointed out before, its going to take U.S. energy independence to finally end the power they have. If we don't move on that, we are sunk in more ways than one.

8:40 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don't fool yourself people! Democrat, republican they are both two wings of the same bird! They are a bunch of sponsered war hawk puppets that bold face lie to us about the real agenda while we bicker over a false left-right paradime. TODAYS NEWSPAPER READS Obama seeks $200 billion for war spending.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/26/war.spending/index.html

Did he not run on CHANGE? Change up where we are fighting maybe! From Iraq to Afganistan. Back to fighting the boogieman i see! Ask the Britts and the Ruskies how easy that is to accomplish!

ONLY ONE PRESIDENT HAS BEEN TRUTHFUL about whats really going on. If you want to see a president address the nation with some truth and courage. Watch this clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaH-lGafwtE

2:08 AM

 
Blogger Laurie Allee said...

So Nikki, how do you spin Obama airstriking homes and schools in Pakistan? We're not at war with Pakistan. Are those murdered children part of Obama's freakin' "vision"? How about the fact that the Soviets couldn't win in Afghanistan after 17 years, that it made Vietnam look like a cakewalk?

It just seems to me that when Obama does it -- it's justified and moral, even if it involves air strikes on innocents. When Bush did it -- it was evil. This is hypocritical madness.

I supposed we only protest wars started and escalated by Republicans?

11:35 AM

 
Blogger Laurie Allee said...

By the way -- ANSWER is calling for a war protest about Obama's Afghanistan and Iraq policies, as well as the strikes in Pakistan. LEt me guess -- it will be a small turnout because it's not protesting Bush.

11:36 AM

 
Blogger Laurie Allee said...

Also, what a lot of people are nervous about is the fact that Obama is not exactly trying to get away from the ideas of the Unitary Executive. You can google it to learn more. Constitutional scholars all over the country write about this. But what do they know.

11:40 AM

 
Blogger Laurie Allee said...

Here's a recent wrap-up of what columnists, ACLU members and others have been noticing about Obama and the Unitary Executive theory.

There's scads more, if anyone is paying attention.

11:51 AM

 
Blogger San Diego Farmgirl said...

Laurie and Yak: that video posted by the second anonymous comment is fantastic! I hadn't seen it before, you should check it out. Better than the stuff I've sent you before.

Here's that link so you don't have to scroll and hunt:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaH-lGafwtE

1:11 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't "spin" anything. I like Obama. Not because he is "cool", not because he is a democrat, not for any other reason except I generally agree with his view points and his plan of attack on all the issues our country faces right now.

I won't even PRETEND to understand all the details of what is going on in Pakistan, Afghan, etc. That is why I voted for him. To make those calls.

For the Liberals bringing our new President down, before even giving him a chance...do you have any "spin" that is favorable to him?

It seems to me that liking him makes me one-sided, but you not liking him and putting down everything the man says and does...is that not one-sided?

I will try really hard to find fault in him to make you guys happy. But I can honestly say that so far his focus is where I think it should be, jobs, health care, education and energy independence and I believe he is going to, with Hillary, find a way to get us out of these wars.

That's not spin, just my gut feeling.

5:25 PM

 
Blogger Laurie Allee said...

It's not that I dislike him. I'm just putting him through the very same critical thinking filter that I use for every politician.

And it's important to learn the intricacies of wars and not just count on someone else to make those decisions. WE make those decisions. Especially since our children are the ones that will fight in them. And other children -- as of last month it was Pakistani children -- who are killed by them.

If you read the news, and see the pictures of bloody toddlers caused by bombs our supposed anti-war president dropped, in a program started by George Bush, then you start wondering about what that person says as opposed to what he actually does.

If Nader were president, I'd still have a critical eye.

As for Unitary Executive stuff -- if we don't stop it, all of it RIGHT NOW, then the next president, possibly not a benevolent democrat that you like, will use those powers (like the signing statements Obama has said he will continue) to do things you DON'T like.

We can support a president and still put every action under a microscope. What I find maddening is the hypocrisy in pointing fingers at Bush and his ilk and then making excuses for Obama when he does The. Same. Things.

Jon Stewart had a great bit where he had clips of Bush and Obama saying sound bites that were virtually alike -- on everything from the war, to tax cuts for businesses, to Israel and Gaza, to the War on Terror to Wall Street. Jon Stewart's side kick for the bit said somehting like, "I know, it's the same. But it's like why we love cheese on Italian food but hate in on Chinese food!"

People so love Obama the charming orator that they want to make the policies they used to disagree with somehow okay.

And I think that's weird.

6:12 PM

 
Blogger Laurie Allee said...

Oh, and about favorable spin... I don't think Obama needs any more, but I always will call out the things I believe are true to the Democratic cause. I just wish I saw more action instead of just words. Like Gitmo, for example. I was thrilled when he talked about closing it -- not so thrilled with the way he plans to do it, the timeline, or the Pentagon's statement a few days ago that Gitmo meets the requirements of the Geneva Convention. THAT didn't make front page news. But it's very important to what happens there.

6:14 PM

 
Blogger Laurie Allee said...

BTW, Nikki -- I'll be so happy if your gut feeling is right and my skepticism is overrated. I'll be jumping for joy and happy to say I was totally wrong. In fact, I'm really hoping that happens. I really want this administration to succeed.

6:23 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, I don't know who flips on their convictions like that...but it isn't me. Did you ever think that I may be FOR rooting out Osama Bin Laden and his cronies and ending this hold they think they think can get over the world by bringing us down?
Oh wait, I forgot, I only like him because he is cute and can put two words together in a sentence...I mean let's face it, I don't read the news!

6:40 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, I don't know who flips on their convictions like that...but it isn't me. Did you ever think that I may be FOR rooting out Osama Bin Laden and his cronies and ending this hold they think they think can get over the world by bringing us down?
Oh wait, I forgot, I only like him because he is cute and can put two words together in a sentence...I mean let's face it, I don't read the news!

6:40 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sorry yak, I posted twice and I don't know how to delete it :)

6:41 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

L--I know I'm right...four years from now, we won't be EXACTLY where we want to be and its not going to be perfect...and he will mess up, but we will get there...we will!!!

6:43 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

L--And just for you I refrained just now from saying...YES WE CAN!!!!! LOL! Crap, I just said it!!! Delete!!!!

6:45 PM

 
Blogger Laurie Allee said...

Rooting out Osama Bin Laden is a criminal problem, not a military one. To think otherwise is not generally consistent with the Democratic party's position about going to war, or with most of the liberal experts who know far about this than I do and have written plenty about it.

Personally, I'll never be for "rooting out" anyone at the expense of murdering children and risking the security of India, Pakistan and the entire region. Incidentally, I wasn't for backing the Taliban back when the US did that, either. I'm certainly not for sending more of our kids -- maybe your nephew and mine and eventually your sons -- into a quagmire with no end at the cost of billions of dollars and thousands of lives.

Put that money into shoring up our ports. Go after al Quaeda the way we go after people like Timothy McVeigh. Al Quaeda is not Pakistan. It's not Afghanistan. It's basically a gang. The tribal situation in Afghanistan is so complex, just ask the Brits and the Soviets. The experts -- the real, true experts -- are warning about what will happen there and nobody seems to be listening in this administration. And too many people who love Obama -- for whatever reason -- are not sounding alarms because he MUST be right. After all. He's not Bush and Cheney.

We can support green energy and advances in education and still protest stupid, ill-conceived, illegal wars.

8:08 PM

 
Blogger Laurie Allee said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

8:13 PM

 
Blogger Laurie Allee said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

8:14 PM

 
Blogger Laurie Allee said...

By saying Democratic, I realize I'm using the adjective as someone who became politically active as a teenager in the late seventies. This is not the Democratic party I knew. (As farmgirl knows -- just ask Biden.)

So, let me rephrase that every time I mentioned Democratic values, I meant LIBERAL values. NOt "progressive" not the new Democratic party but classic liberalism like Robert Reich has written so eloquently about. The core values that made this country great.

I tend to agree with those who say that Dems and REpublicans are all part of the same coin, beholden to wall street and the military industrial complex. Two flavors in the same stew.

8:16 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well just as a side note, Obama made NO effort to hide that he would go into Pakistan if they think they are going to harbor terrorist and get away with it. In his democratic nomination speech he even said he believes we should get Osama Bin Laden....I honestly do agree with getting him...I remember 9/11 and he was responsible...they came to our land, trained under our teachers, and flew OUR children and PEOPLE into major buildings killing thousands of Americans...I can't easily forget that. I think we should try and stop him if we can...if that makes me Progressive and not "Old School" Democrat..then so be it. But, there are very STARK ideaological differences in the two parties...50 years ago and today...beginning with the abolition of slavery (which split the party) to abortion...the list could go on and on....

8:20 AM

 
Blogger Yakpate said...

I am overwhelmed and deeply appreciative of the response to this post.

I can’t reply to every contributor, except to say “Thank You,” and that I read every word of every comment. But love and personal integrity… along with my innate optimism and tendency to revel in the contradictions of life… compel me to reply to Laurie and Nikkis. WOW! Your honesty and willingness to tell it like you believe it made this one of my best posts ever. In fact, when I was getting so much readership during the election, your debates were hugely responsible for that, too.

In case I have not already made this clear: I do not take it personally when readers rant over all the misdeeds Obama has done or will do, as they see it. But I do not share the Left’s moral fervor and outrage over Obama’s shortcomings. In fact, I think it’s kind of funny… considering that the new President has, in less than a month:

Signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act
Repealed the Global Gag Rule, which denied aid to nations that permit abortion
Issued new guidelines on the Freedom of Information Act: “In the face of doubt, openness prevails”
Announced the closure of Gitmo
Declared that the United States “Will Not Torture”
Signed the Children’s Health Insurance Reauthorization Act
Signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Its provisions include $80 billion for a wide variety of environmental programs to reverse damage done during the Bush Administraton.) http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/18/opinion/18wed1.html?_r=2
Announced a specific timetable for ending the war in Iraq

Before anyone takes the opportunity to explain why these accomplishments don’t go far enough, or have negative consequences, or aren’t as good as they should be, I ask that Instead, you compare them to the actions that made us cringe EVERY DAY of the Bush Administration.

I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again: Obama was not elected to restore the universal balance between good and evil, or, as many would have it, to destroy evil by enacting every component of the Left’s agenda. He was elected to lead our nation on a better path… and, as he says, he is “Everybody’s President,” so that path will follow a trajectory from the Left to the Center to the Right and back again. What it will not do is lead us into a maze of fundamentalist-based repression, creationism over science, and global warming is a myth reactionary bullshit. I deeply appreciate this. I breathe a huge sigh of relief at this. In fact, I bask in the light of what Obama HAS done, and at how soon it is dissipating the shadow cast by the Bush administration.

THIS DOES NOT MEAN I OPPOSE DISSENT. I know that dissent is the lifeblood of freedom. I know that the burr under the saddle makes the horse pay more attention to where it is going, and occasionally rear up to throw off an undeserving rider. And I also know that Obama is not perfect, that he will take some actions I won't like and not take other actions I would like to see taken.

But I do make this observation: Automatically seizing upon every action taken by Obama as an opportunity to express pessimism about his intentions borders on nihilism. It suggests, to me, that we all project our unmet needs on the lightening-rod symbol of the President.

By the way, Nikkis: See that cute little trash can at the bottom of your posted comment? Just click to delete a comment! One of the readers on Laurie’s blog taught me that yesterday!

And everyone else: I am encouraging San Diego Farm Girl to help her significant other write a guest blog that will be the Mother of all Exposes… just wait!

10:58 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home